While I have often warned about highly leveraged buyers who could be in trouble down the road, there are scenarios in which buying a home right now is not exactly a terrible idea. If one has a significant down payment, is saving for retirement and/or a rainy day, is in a stable job, not planning to move for quite some time, can stomach a loss in real estate and if rent and mortgage payments are close, then it can be in some circumstances, not a bad time to buy.
I have had some ads emailed to me from kijiji where some people are paying $1400 to $1600 and more just to rent for a house! To me this means not only are we in housing bubble but a rent bubble. While house prices are financed by credit, rents are financed by wages and the increase in rents are not a reflection of the increase in wages over the last few years. What has happened is that recent speculators or landlords have bought at crazy heights and must charge astronomical prices for rent to make ends meet. But they have lucked out as housing demand is tight and so poor renters are forced to pay what these landlords are charging. Eventually, the rental market will correct, timing it though is tough to figure out. With that all said, it seems rents are a mortgage payment are not that far apart. More on this in a bit.
The argument I hear is that maybe house prices fall down a bit here in Saskatoon, but with mortgage rates being so low, any negative equity that does happen will not be for long. So of course I graphed this scenario. Here is how a loss of 20% in house prices looks like with a 25 year mortgage at 3.5% being paid down at $1800 a month. In Saskatoon the average house in a decent area ( not condo or townhome) is around $360,000.
Here I am suggesting in this example the value of this house would lose 20% in 5 years and stagnate for a decade. Does not look so bad, does it? Negative equity would only happen for a small period of time. But this does not take into account that the monthly economic maintenance cost of a house is near $300 to $400 a month, property taxes of $300 a month, home insurance of $60 a month, and mortgage and disability insurance ( non-smokers, smokers add more) of $90 a month. So even though rent at $1600 and a mortgage payment of $1800 are nearly the same, the associated costs of a mortgage compared to renting are quite a bit higher. Ownership cost is near 50% higher. And this is factoring in that interest rates stay 3.5% for 15 years.
On the other hand, the benefits of paying over 50% more for a mortgage compared to rent of a house might be worth it to many people. But there a few households that are first time or young buyers who can shell out $2500 a month or more just for an average house AND can save for retirement, AND pay for kids activities, AND save some for kids schooling, AND save for vacations, AND not be house poor. But if you can do all that, can potentially stomach a loss in real estate values and look at a house as a place to live in, not as an investment, then maybe the premium of home ownership can make sense.

First of all, thanks for the post I always appreciate your analysis.
ReplyDeleteYour statement that renting is in a bubble is interesting. I have been thinking about that myself for awhile now. The rents definitely rose with the housing bubble so perhaps they are tied to housing on the way down as well. That being said, from what I have read about in the states rents have actually stayed fairly consistent during the crash. What I read was that all the foreclosures were actually causing shortages in rentals as houses sat vacant, the remaining rental property filled up. As a potential investor in rental properties I would be interested in knowing what i am up against. So please prove me wrong, is there evidence in past historical real estate crashes of rental prices going down as well?
"So please prove me wrong, is there evidence in past historical real estate crashes of rental prices going down as well?"
DeleteUnfortunately, I can only find rent data back to 1992. It would be nice to find how rents did during the real estate busts in western Canada in the 80's and the GTA in the early 90's, but I don't have the data. Calgary did have a peak in rents in 2008 and in 2011, rents were still down by 5.6%. Check out this interactive graph from CMHC. http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/corp/about/cahoob/cahoob_004.cfm
As I have said before, house prices are financed by credit and rents are financed by wages. But there are short periods of time when rents can be distorted as well such as when housing demand is very strong like we see in Saskatoon. Average wages have not gone up as much as rents over the last half decade so renters are spending more on housing and less on other things. Can this be sustained? We will see.
I love real estate, one of the reasons why I do this blog. And I can see myself in the future having a rental property. The time that I will buy a rental property, is when the herd is saying "it's a great time to be a renter". Right now we are on the other side of the spectrum.